The world of children’s literature is arguing the value of the Newbery Award. Once the pinnacle, the guarantee of increased book sales, the Newbery has been having less of an influence in recent years. An Internet debate has ensued.
Blogger Joanne Jacobs identifies an article entitled “Has the Newbery Lost Its Way?” in School Library Journal, written by Anita Silvey. She believes, based on conversations with librarians, teachers, and book sellers, that recent Newbery winners haven’t attracted readers. Simply, the award isn’t making a difference when kids choose books.
The Washington Post ran an article offering a similar proposal, that the Newbery may actually “dampen kids’ reading.”
I’ve long argued that children’s books are too serious. My students have often discussed why so many books involve children losing their parents and facing real hardship. The overwhelming success of books like the Harry Potter series, the Spiderwick Chronicles, and more recently Jeff Kinney’s Wimpy Kid books, show that kids want to have fun reading.
I began taking notice when I read Karen Hesse’s Out of the Dust shortly after it was awarded the Newbery in 1998. Set in the miserable conditions of the dust bowl, the main character is a 14 year old girl named Billie Jo. She attempts to put out a fire on her mother’s clothing with a nearby bucket of water, which turns out to be kerosene. The mother and her younger brother are badly burned and both eventually die. Billie Jo, whose only outlet is playing the piano, severely burns her hands. Like other Karen Hesse books, the story is beautifully written. But like the time period in which it is set, the book is depressing right to the end.
The Newbery shouldn’t be given to best sellers or the most popular among books. It should be reserved for those that stand out among all others, for the story told and the author’s ability to do so. But the American Library Association, which awards the Newbery, needs to keep in mind that children are the audience.