…the teacher said he was under no contractual obligation to phone a parent.
There are many good teachers in our public schools. Most care about kids and want to do what is best for them. But if the music teacher indeed said this to James Petrella, as the Johnston parent alleges in the front page Journal article on work-to-rule, he should immediately be fired. Can we ever trust a teacher who would only contact a parent if required by a contract?
The contract stalemate in Johnston reveals a significant problem within our public schools: unionization. What would make a professional teacher believe it is not an obligation to keep a parent informed? The parent, of course, is a taxpayer who pays the teacher’s salary. But with a union as a backbone, this teacher feels he is under no obligation to do his best, to impress. The very minimum is all that is required.
In what other profession could an employee flatly say to those who pay his salary, “I’m only going to do the bare minimum.”
A significant problem is the law that mandates an expired contract be recognized until a new one is agreed upon. School districts looking for concessions to save money have no leverage. Union negotiators can just sit and wait it out. But it is the very contract itself that is the real problem. Work-to-rule wouldn’t exist if contracts didn’t outline every aspect of a teacher’s job.
Teachers demand they be treated like other professionals. But we must act like professionals first. Do doctors rely on contracts to determine which services they should provide to their patients? Do contracts outline every aspect of legal advice a lawyer might have to provide? Could a restaurant manager walk by a dirty table, and explain to the customer that his contract doesn’t require him to clean it?
Our contracts should be limited to salary and benefits, and perhaps a few basic working conditions such as class size. It should not be a fifty or sixty page document outlining every single requirement of the job. We are, after all, professionals.
Contacting parents about students’ progress is a minimum requirement in our profession. There’s no room for any teacher who needs a contract to tell him to do so. And because the contract has long expired, there should be nothing stopping Johnston officials from firing that music teacher.